Quantcast

Article

Do regulators want to end fixed annuities? 

 
Print This Article
Return To Article
Normal Text
Large Text

FINRA and the North American Securities Administrators Association won the index annuity battle and persuaded the SEC to call index annuities securities by saying they would do a better job of determining when an index annuity sale is suitable.

However, instead of setting suitability guidelines for index annuity sales, in a recent press release, the NASAA said “Equity-indexed annuities ... have taken an especially heavy toll on our senior citizens for whom they are clearly unsuitable.” According to NASAA, an index annuity sale is never suitable.

Sound bites from securities regulators on why deferred annuities are bad often settle on surrender charges. The whipping boy they used a few years ago was the mythical index annuity product with a 20-year surrender period (that never existed in the first place). It appears it isn’t the length of the surrender charge that truly is the talking point, but merely the fact that a deferred annuity is used.

In a recent Massachusetts securities case, the regulator jumped on the fact that one of the annuities replacing equities had a 10-year “lock-up” and another had a five-year “lock-up”­—a pejorative synonym for “surrender period.” A Missouri case pointed out that two of the consumer’s new annuities were currently paying 3.25 percent interest and that the existing equity accounts had “gained over 23 percent in the two years prior to their liquidation.”

What I find disturbing is that the Massachusetts regulator failed to comment on the fact that 90 percent of the 82-year-old consumer’s assets were in the stock market before moving some of them to fixed annuities. Similarly, the Missouri regulator did not opine on whether the 2008 stock market would hold any risks for the 75-year-old consumer in that case.

The securities industry sells stocks and bonds; fixed annuities do not fit their model and are competition for investment money. This is coupled with the reality that the annuity industry has many toxic product designs built to maximize commissions and not consumer returns. There are also too many carriers that do not provide transparent performance results.

Part of the answer is education. I have sent letters to journalists who recently have had articles mentioning the safety of bonds, asking them to talk about multi-year-rate fixed annuities and showing the actual yields of index annuities. If I can get the media to report that at least some deferred annuities are good, it will become difficult for the securities regulator to end an entire industry.



Comment on This Article

Name:
Email (will not be published):
Subject:
Comment:

    • 11/12/2009 11:01:57 AM
    • anonymous
    • Do regulators want to end fixed annuities?
    • Do regulators want to end fixed annuities? FINRA and the North American Securities Administrators Association won the index annuity battle and persuaded the SEC to call index annuities securities by saying they would do a better job of determining when an index annuity sale is suitable.
    • 11/12/2009 11:04:20 AM
    • anonymous
    • Re: Do regulators want to end fixed annuities?
    • Is this the same SEC that couldn't figure out that there was a $50 billion scam going on right under their noses??? The SEC to me is a 'big joke'.* Who are these 'smug individuals' who stick their noses into the insurance industry? An indexed annuity is great for the majority of people, and I think the industry as a whole has weeded out our 'bad apples'. I don't have one client that I've sold an Indexed Annuity to, that has lost a dime of their earnings or principal and gains since the financial sector went into a nose dive. Can the SEC say that about their guys who sell Variable Annuities, Stocks and Mutual Funds? Let's face it, the Insurance Industry designed the Index Annuity and it was very well received by our markets. We gave the clients a chance to save money on a more conservative measure, we guaranteed their principal, and guaranteed they would not lose a single penny of their earnings if the financial markets went south, as well as gave them a portion of the gains depending on the type of indexed annuity. To me it doesn't get any sweeter than that. The client in Massachusetts, would be in much better shape with the indexed annuity under today's conditions! * I have a personal story I could tell you about in regards to the ever vigilant SEC.
    • 11/12/2009 11:05:00 AM
    • anonymous
    • Re: Do regulators want to end fixed annuities?
    • The SEC, via Rule 151a, leaves the bulk of regulation to the state insurance departments. Suitability laws are much better developed in Federal Securities Law than in state law. State insurance regulators can do a lot better job with those suitability requirements in place. Opposition to 151a seems solely based upon sales, not suitability. Most people who hear about indexed annuities are amazed and appalled that they aren't regulated as securities. Sales based upon the investment potential, rather than the lifetime annuity payment guarantee, make the product a security.
    • 11/12/2009 11:05:57 AM
    • anonymous
    • Re: Do regulators want to end fixed annuities?
    • 'Sales based upon the investment potential, rather than the lifetime annuity payment guarantee, make the product a security.' No, that is determined by risk, and the Securities act of 1934. Looking at how the last 16 months have gone I wish more people would have been offered FIA's.
    • 11/12/2009 11:07:01 AM
    • anonymous
    • Re: Do regulators want to end fixed annuities?
    • 'Sales based upon the investment potential, rather than the lifetime annuity payment guarantee, make the product a security.' No, that is determined by risk, and the Securities act of 1934. Looking at how the last 16 months have gone I wish more people would have been offered FIA's.' Rule 151 (the 1986 Safe Harbor' Rule) puts annuity sales focused on investment gains outside the safe harbor, i.e., securities.

eNewsletter

Sign-up for Senior Market Advisor’s free, weekly eNewsletter for even more best practices, selling tips, marketing ideas & industry trend information for insurance professionals.




www.summitbusinessmedia.com (c) Copyright Senior Market Advisor Magazine. A Summit Business Media publication. All Rights Reserved.